A 10-year analysis of the racial distribution of authors in plastic surgery research and the impact of minority mentorship.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the racial distribution in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) publication authorship and illustrates the impact underrepresented in medicine (URiM) mentorship has on increasing diverse trainee contributions to the PRS peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: Articles published in the seven highest-impact PRS peer-reviewed journals within the last 10 years (2012-2022) were reviewed and analyzed for first and senior authors' race and ethnicity, publication year, and citation count. RESULTS: A total of 23,549 publications were identified of which 8250 were from the US-based institutions. A random sampling of 778 publications (∼10 â€‹%) were scrutinized for first and senior author race and ethnicity. Across all journals, 64.5 â€‹% of senior authors were White, 29.9 â€‹% Asian, 4.6 â€‹% Hispanic, and 1.0 â€‹% Black. First authors were 59.5 â€‹% White, 32.8 â€‹% Asian, 5.2 â€‹% Hispanic, and 2.6 â€‹% Black (p=<0.0001). The presence of a URiM senior author increased the likelihood of a URiM first author 7-fold (p=<0.0001); 95 â€‹% CI [3.5-14.0]). There was no statistically significant difference in the total citation count relative to author race or ethnicity. The Aesthetic Surgery Journal had the greatest proportion of White senior authors (73.6 â€‹%), while Microsurgery had the highest percentage of URiM senior authors (8.7 â€‹%). CONCLUSIONS: URiM authorship of PRS publications is limited and mentorship is essential to improve underrepresented perspectives in the PRS peer-reviewed literature.

Assessing the Reliability of Facial Feminization Content on Social Media and Its Impact on the Dissemination of Misinformation.

BACKGROUND: The surge in social media usage has transformed the dissemination and consumption of healthcare information, notably impacting plastic surgery and cosmetic specialties. This study focuses on the influence of social media, particularly Instagram and TikTok, in shaping perceptions of individuals seeking facial feminization (FF) procedures. METHODS: Using the validated DISCERN scale, we assessed the reliability and accuracy of FF content on TikTok and Instagram. The study also analyzed the relationship between content reliability on engagement metrics (likes, comments, views) and the type of content shared (educational, testimonial, promotional). RESULTS: The analysis encompassed 225 TikTok videos and 75 Instagram posts. TikTok content showed 9.33% as "very poor," 66.2% as "poor," 22.6% as "fair," and only 1.33% as "excellent." Similarly, Instagram content demonstrated 14.67% as "very poor" and 69.33% as "poor," with no content rated as "good" or "excellent." Educational content received higher reliability scores on both platforms. TikTok engagement metrics showed lower reliability ratings correlating with more views, comments, and likes. CONCLUSION: The study underscores the critical role of social media in shaping patient perspectives on FF procedures. The prevalence of inaccurate information necessitates a focus on responsible engagement by healthcare professionals, aiming to provide accurate, educational content that aligns with patients' informational needs and ultimately enhances surgical outcomes.

Understanding the Drivers of Cost and Length of Stay in a Cohort of 21,875 Patients with Severe Burn.

Burn management has significantly advanced in the past 75 years, resulting in improved mortality rates. However, there are still over one million burn victims in the United States each year, with over 3,000 burn-related deaths annually. The impacts of individual patient, hospital, and regional demographics on length of stay (LOS) and total cost have yet to be fully explored in a large nationally representative cohort. Thus, this study aimed to examine various hospital and patient characteristics using a sample of over 20,000 patients. Inpatient data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2015 were analyzed, and only patients with an ICD-9 code for second- or third-degree burns were included. In addition, a major operating room procedure must have been indicated on the discharge summary for patients to be included in the final dataset, ensuring that only severe burns requiring complex care were analyzed. Analysis of covariance models was used to evaluate the impact of various patient, hospital, and regional variables on both LOS and cost. The study found that skin grafts and fasciotomy significantly increased the cost of hospitalization. Having burns on the face, neck, and trunk significantly increased costs for patients with second-degree burns, while burns on the trunk resulted in the longest LOS for patients with third-degree burns. Infections in the hospital and additional procedures, such as flaps and skin grafts, also led to longer stays. The study also found that the prevalence of postoperative complications, such as electrolyte imbalance, was high among patients with burn surgery.

Evaluating the Impact of Residency Research Productivity on Craniofacial Surgeons' Career Trajectory.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate trends in publication productivity over the past 50 years and how they correlate with the stage of training as well as the competitiveness of residency and fellowship programs. The authors hypothesize that research qualifications play an important role in obtaining a competitively ranked craniofacial surgery fellowship and that over the past 50 years, there has been an upward shift in the research qualifications held by applicants at the time of application. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was performed involving all 121 academic craniofacial surgeons in the United States for whom sex, years since fellowship, current institution rank, current academic position, and years since graduation were available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between research qualifications, as determined by the overall number of publications, number of first authorship publications, H-index scores, and years since fellowship completion, was examined. The study also analyzed the placement of surgeons at programs ranked in the top 25 versus the lower 25. RESULTS: As the number of decades since beginning craniofacial fellowship decreased, the average number of first authorship publications and average H-index increased. Those who attended higher-ranking residency and fellowship programs had a higher average number of publications, number of first authorship publications, and H-index. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 5 decades, research productivity at all stages of medical training has surged, potentially fueled by the trend toward pass/fail grading in medical school evaluations and standardized exams and the need to differentiate oneself in an increasingly competitive field.

"Advancing Face Transplantation: A Critical Analysis of Revisions and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes in Ten Cases".

BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a viable solution for reconstructing the most complex facial injuries. Prior work has demonstrated that surgical revisions are necessary to optimize outcomes. The authors' group has updated the previous report of revisions in their cohort, quantified and described which revisions were performed for functional, aesthetic, or mixed indications, and described the rationale, safety, and long-term outcomes of these revisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the authors' ten face transplants was performed from April 2009 to February 2023. The patients' medical records, preoperative facial defects, and operative reports (index and secondary revisions) were reviewed. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One patient underwent irreversible acute on chronic allograft rejection and received a second face transplant. The average number of revisions was 5.2 per patient (range, 2 to 11 procedures). The median time interval from transplantation to first revision was 4 months (range, 1 to 21 months). Median follow-up was 106 months (range 39 to 142 months). Most interventions consisted of debulking the allograft or revising the periorbital tissues. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we report longer term data on revision surgeries needed in face transplant recipients. Patients should expect to undergo revisions for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Although the majority of revisions are performed within two years following transplantation, revisions can be safely performed at any time point. Shared decision-making between the patient and provider team is essential in deciding which revisions are performed and when.

National Trends in Microtia Repair Cost and Hospital Length of Stay.

Microtia can have deleterious impacts on the functional, psychological, and aesthetic outcomes of affected young children. Reconstructive procedures can alleviate these negative outcomes and significantly improve the quality of life for patients; however, the cost and length of hospital stay (LOS) for such procedures and the factors that impact them have not been well-characterized. This study seeks to understand the hospital-level (institution type, size, and geographic region) and patient-level factors (race, age, and insurance status) that impact cost and LOS in patients who undergo microtia reconstructive surgery. A retrospective data analysis was conducted utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2008 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included patients who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnostic code for microtia (744.23) as well as a procedure for microtia correction (186×/187×). A total of 714 microtia repair cases met the inclusion criteria and were sampled from the NIS database. Microtia repair cost was significantly increased on the West Coast compared with the Northeast ($34,947 versus $29,222, P =0.020), increased with patient age ($614/y, P =0.012), and gradually increased from 2008 to 2015 ($25,897-$48,985, P <0.001). Microtia LOS was significantly increased with government-controlled hospitals compared with private hospitals (1.93 versus 1.39 d, P =0.005), increased with patients on Medicaid compared with private insurance (2.33 versus 2.00 d, P =0.036), and overall decreased with patient age (-0.07 d/y, P =0.001). The results not only identify the multifactorial impacts that drive cost and LOS in microtia repair but provide insights into the financial and medical considerations patients and their families must navigate.

"Morphologic Severity and Age at Surgery Are Associated with School Age Neurocognitive Outcomes in Metopic Craniosynostosis".

BACKGROUND: Radiographic severity of metopic synostosis has been suggested as a predictor of long-term neurocognitive outcomes, and artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been used to quantify severity. Age at surgery is predictive of long-term neurocognition in sagittal synostosis but has not been adequately explored in metopic synostosis. METHODS: Children ages 6 to 18 years old with corrected metopic synostosis underwent testing of intelligence quotient (IQ), academic achievement, and visuomotor integration (VMI). Various manual measurements and AI-derived severity scores were determined. Scans were categorized as moderate or severe for head-to-head comparisons and multivariable linear regressions were used to assess the relationship of age at surgery and severity with neurocognitive outcomes. RESULTS: 41 patients with average age at testing of 10.8 ± 3.4 years were included. 18 patients were in the severe group while 23 patients were in the moderate group with average ages at surgery 6.6 ± 2.7 and 10.6 ± 8.4 months, respectively (p = 0.062). Greater AI-derived severity was significantly associated with lower reading comprehension (p = 0.040 and 0.018) and reading composite scores (p = 0.024 and p = 0.008). Older age at surgery was significantly associated with lower VMI scores (p-values ranging from 0.017 to 0.045) and reading composite scores (p = 0.047 and 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an association between greater AI-derived radiographic severity and lower reading ability in corrected metopic synostosis. Older age at surgery was independently associated with lower reading ability and visuomotor integration. Surgical correction may mitigate neurodevelopmental differences based on severity that have been observed pre-operatively.

Pediatric Facial Burns and Consumer Products: A Nationwide Analysis.

Pediatric facial burns pose significant challenges in terms of physical, psychological, and social impacts on children. Understanding the causes of these burns is crucial for prevention and appropriate care. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of causes and preventive measures related to pediatric facial burns caused by consumer products. Using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) from 2012 to 2021, we analyzed 130,461 cases of pediatric facial burns. Common causes included household items such as cleaning supplies, hot water, kitchen appliances, and health and beauty products. Differences in burn causes were observed between genders, with boys more prone to burns from welding equipment, gasoline, and grills, while girls were more susceptible to burns from hair curling equipment, candles, and health and beauty products. The mean age of children burned by different items varied, highlighting the need for age-appropriate preventive measures. The authors discuss the importance of caregiver education, safe storage practices, supervision, and clear communication in preventing pediatric facial burns. By raising awareness of potential burn sources and implementing preventive strategies, the incidence of pediatric facial burns can be significantly reduced.

Long-term neurocognitive outcomes in 204 single-suture craniosynostosis patients.

PURPOSE: Craniosynostosis, which describes premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, has been associated with a variety of neurocognitive deficits. We sought to explore the cognitive profiles of the various types of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC). METHODS: A retrospective review of children 6-18 years old with surgically corrected NSC who underwent neurocognitive testing (Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visuomotor Integration) from the years 2014-2022 was conducted. RESULTS: 204 patients completed neurocognitive testing (139 sagittal, 39 metopic, 22 unicoronal, 4 lambdoid suture). 110 (54%) of the cohort was male, and 150 (74%) were White. Mean IQ was 106.10±14.01 and mean age at surgery and testing were 9.0±12.2 months and 10.9±4.0 years, respectively. Sagittal synostosis was associated with higher scores than metopic synostosis, with significant differences in verbal IQ (109.42±15.76 vs 101.37±10.41), full-scale IQ (108.32±14.44 vs 100.05±11.76), visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 92.44±12.07), visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 95.87±11.23), and motor coordination (90.45±15.60 vs 84.21±15.44). Sagittal synostosis was associated with significantly higher scores for visuomotor integration (101.62±13.64 vs 94.95±10.24) and visual perception (103.81±12.42 vs 94.82±12.75) than unicoronal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with sagittal synostosis, patients with metopic synostosis exhibited lower scores in verbal IQ, full-scale IQ, visuomotor integration, visual perception, and motor control after surgical correction. Despite surgical correction for premature metopic suture fusion, the effect on the adjacent frontal lobe and white matter connections to other regions of the brain may have a lasting functional impact. Patients with unicoronal synostosis exhibited lower visuomotor integration and visual perception scores.

Role of State Insurance Policy in Orthotic Helmet Access for Deformational Plagiocephaly.

BACKGROUND: Helmet therapy for deformational plagiocephaly has an ideal window for treatment, and timely access to care is vital to achieving optimal benefit. The authors evaluated the hypothesis that patients insured through Medicaid experience decreased access to helmet therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of referrals for helmet therapy to Cranial Technologies, Inc. between 2014 and 2020 across 21 states. Outcome measures were likelihood of receiving a helmet, receiving a second helmet, receiving delayed treatment, and having delayed presentation. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2020, a total of 219,869 patients were referred and 141,513 of these received a helmet. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive treatment (OR, 0.63; P < 0.001) and more likely to present late (OR, 1.55; P < 0.001) or receive delayed treatment (OR, 3.24; P < 0.001) compared with the commercially insured. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive helmet therapy in nine states, with the strongest association in Texas (OR, 0.32; P < 0.001), and more likely to receive helmet therapy in five states, with the strongest association in Colorado (OR, 1.89; P < 0.001). Medicaid was associated with late presentation and delayed treatment in all states. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Medicaid presented later and were less likely to receive helmet therapy. Findings reflected state-specific Medicaid policies, with patients in some states more likely to receive a helmet with Medicaid than with commercial insurance. However, late presentation and delays in treatment with Medicaid were observed across all states. State-specific Medicaid restrictions are likely a driving factor in determining access to helmet therapy.

Orthotic Helmet Therapy for Deformational Plagiocephaly: Stratifying Outcomes by Insurance.

OBJECTIVE: Deformational Plagiocephaly (DP) is commonly treated with cranial orthosis, or helmet therapy. A large, national study on the impact of insurance status on helmet outcomes is lacking. We assessed treatment outcomes for helmet therapy based on insurance status. DESIGN: This was a retrospective data analysis of patients referred to Cranial Technologies, Inc for helmet therapy between 2014-2020 across 21 states. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: There were a total of 211,417 patients referred for helmeting, of whom 141,513 received helmet therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Multivariate regression was used to assess the relationship of insurance status with post-treatment residual flattening, measured by cephalic index (CI) and cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), and treating provider rating of success. RESULTS: Patients with Medicaid were more likely to complete treatment with residual flattening measured by CI and CVAI when compared to patients with private insurance (OR: 1.58, CI: 1.51-1.65, p < 0.001 and OR: 1.21, CI: 1.15-1.28, p < 0.001, respectively). Providers of patients with Medicaid were more likely to give a low rating of success following treatment (OR: 3.25, CI: 2.70-3.92, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigating the impact of insurance status on helmet therapy across 21 states found that patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience residual flattening and have lower provider-rated outcomes compared to those with commercial insurance. Given significant caregiver burden posed by helmet therapy, which requires frequent visits and consistent helmet use, caregivers of patients with Medicaid may require greater support to reduce outcome disparities observed here.

Assessment of Sex Diversity Among Craniofacial Academic Faculty.

Sex diversity among plastic surgery and its subspecialties faculties lags behind many medical specialties. Despite the significant evidence in favor of diversity in leadership, female presence in high-ranking positions in medicine is lacking across multiple specialties. In this study, we aim to evaluate sex disparity among faculty across craniofacial fellowship programs by comparing the disparities among total number of faculty, program directors, years in practice, and academic rank. Our sample included 354 individuals including 193 craniofacial surgery journal editorial board members, 130 craniofacial surgery academic faculty members, and 31 craniofacial surgery association board members. A significant difference (P-value <0.0001) was seen among male and female craniofacial surgery faculty with 84.6% males. Faculty members were further subdivided by academic rank. A significant difference was found between the number of male and female faculty members at all academic positions (P-value =0.043). Of 41 full professors, 2.4% were female. There were 42 associate professors queried with 14.3% female. Similarly, 43 assistant professors were identified with 32.0% female. Years in practice after completing terminal training were analyzed across the academic faculty. There was a significant difference in the number of male and female faculty members across all experience levels (P-value =0.0037). Among the faculty with <10 years since completion of terminal training, 32.4 % were female. For faculty with 10 to 20 years after post-terminal training, 19.6% were female. For those with 20 to 30 years of experience, 0% were female. Finally, for the faculty with over 30 years since graduation, 5.9% were female. Board membership in 2 craniofacial surgery organizations was analyzed: the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association and the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons. Among the 17 board members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 8 (47.1%) were female. For the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, 5 (35.7%) were female. Data were collected for 193 editorial board members from 2 craniofacial surgery journals. There was a significant difference between the number of male and female members across both journals (χ2 value: 33.3570; P-value <0.0001). Among 56 editorial board members from Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 26 (46.4%) members were female. In comparison, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery has 24.8% female editorial board members. Sex diversity among faculty members is really important and should be brought into light to highlight and improve areas of particular importance and of tremendous potential impact. Given our results, surgical residencies and fellowship programs should begin to show concrete commitment and increase their efforts to recruit and retain a diverse faculty not only for the educational benefit but more importantly to achieve a higher level of care for all.

Flap to Mastectomy Mass: Are Higher Ratios Associated with Greater Breast Reconstruction Satisfaction?

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes compared with prosthetic techniques, but little is known about the relationship between autologous flap mass and patient satisfaction. We hypothesized that a higher differential mass (ratio of flap mass to mastectomy mass) would be associated with greater satisfaction with reconstruction. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020 with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap completed the BREAST-Q survey. Multivariate linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between differential mass and patient satisfaction. Models controlled for body mass index (BMI), age at surgery, reconstruction size preference, number of surgeries, previous surgery failure, whether the patient underwent radiation therapy, and whether reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients (70 breasts) completed the BREAST-Q survey. Mean age at reconstruction was 52.2 years and mean time to survey completion following surgery was 21.1 months. Most patients (59.4%) desired a smaller breast after reconstruction. The mean differential mass was +26.3% (flap mass greater than mastectomy mass). Differential mass was positively associated with all satisfaction measures with results being significant for satisfaction with breasts scores (p=0.032). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, a higher ratio of autologous flap mass to mastectomy mass was associated with overall higher patient-reported satisfaction. A 1:1 flap to mastectomy mass ratio may not adequately reapproximate desired breast size or shape. Larger autologous flap mass may be favorable for long-term patient satisfaction, and future studies should investigate the relationship between differential mass and breast esthetics.

Predictive Factors of Outcomes in Helmet Therapy for Deformational Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly.

Deformational plagiocephaly and brachycephaly, or abnormal flattening of the infant skull due to external forces, are often managed with orthotic helmet therapy. Although helmet therapy is widely used, the factors that predict poor outcomes are not well characterized. In this study of over 140,000 patients who received helmet therapy, older age and greater severity at presentation, and noncompliance with treatment were each independently associated with worse craniometric and provider-reported outcomes. Each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index or cephalic index at a presentation is associated with an increased likelihood of residual brachycephaly at completion [odds ratio (OR): 1.067; 95% Cl: 1.058-1.075; P <0.0001 and OR: 2.043; 95% CI: 2.021-2.065; P <0.0001, respectively], whereas each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index at a presentation associated with increased likelihood of residual asymmetry at completion (OR: 2.148; 95% Cl: 2.118-2.179; P <0.0001). Patients were more likely to have residual brachycephaly or asymmetry with increasing age at treatment initiation (OR: 1.562; 95% CI: 1.524-1.600; P <0.0001 and OR: 1.673; 95% Cl: 1.634-1.713; P <0.0001, respectively, for each additional month of age at initiation). These results highlight a need for prompt referral for helmeting, especially in cases with severe features or when patients present late to care. Potentially modifiable factors are age at helmeting and compliance with treatment protocols, and consideration of these factors may be important for achieving success in some cases.

"Validation of Artificial Intelligence Severity Assessment in Metopic Craniosynostosis".

OBJECTIVE: Several severity metrics have been developed for metopic craniosynostosis, including a recent machine learning-derived algorithm. This study assessed the diagnostic concordance between machine learning and previously published severity indices. DESIGN: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of patients who underwent surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis were quantitatively analyzed for severity. Each scan was manually measured to derive manual severity scores and also received a scaled metopic severity score (MSS) assigned by the machine learning algorithm. Regression analysis was used to correlate manually captured measurements to MSS. ROC analysis was performed for each severity metric and were compared to how accurately they distinguished cases of metopic synostosis from controls. RESULTS: In total, 194 CT scans were analyzed, 167 with metopic synostosis and 27 controls. The mean scaled MSS for the patients with metopic was 6.18 ± 2.53 compared to 0.60 ± 1.25 for controls. Multivariable regression analyses yielded an R-square of 0.66, with significant manual measurements of endocranial bifrontal angle (EBA) (P = 0.023), posterior angle of the anterior cranial fossa (p < 0.001), temporal depression angle (P = 0.042), age (P < 0.001), biparietal distance (P < 0.001), interdacryon distance (P = 0.033), and orbital width (P < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated a high diagnostic value of the MSS (AUC = 0.96, P < 0.001), which was comparable to other validated indices including the adjusted EBA (AUC = 0.98), EBA (AUC = 0.97), and biparietal/bitemporal ratio (AUC = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning algorithm offers an objective assessment of morphologic severity that provides a reliable composite impression of severity. The generated score is comparable to other severity indices in ability to distinguish cases of metopic synostosis from controls.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Cleft Rhinoplasty.

Various sociodemographic factors affect patient access to care. This study aims to assess how factors such as government-funded insurance and socioeconomic status impact the ability of adolescents with cleft lip-associated nasal deformities to access secondary rhinoplasty procedures. Patients older than 13 years old with a history of cleft lip/palate were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2012. Those who received a secondary rhinoplasty were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) procedural codes. A multivariate logistic regression model with post hoc analyses was performed to analyze if insurance status, socioeconomic status, and hospital-level variables impacted the likelihood of undergoing rhinoplasty. Of the 874 patients with a cleft lip/palate history, 154 (17.6%) underwent a secondary rhinoplasty. After controlling for various patient-level and hospital-level variables, living in a higher income quartile (based on zip code of residence) was an independent predictor of receiving a secondary cleft rhinoplasty (odds ratio=1.946, P =0.024). Patients had lower odds of receiving a cleft rhinoplasty if care occurred in a private, nonprofit hospital compared with a government-owned hospital (odds ratio=0.506, P =0.030). Income status plays a significant role in cleft rhinoplasty access, with patients from lower income households less likely to receive a secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Hospital-specific factors such as geographic region, bed size, urbanization, and teaching status may also create barriers for patients and their families in accessing surgical care for cleft lip nasal deformities.

Racial and geographic disparities in reconstructive procedures following melanoma resection.

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma occurs most commonly in non-Hispanic White patients; however, Black and Hispanic patients experience greater morbidity and mortality. This study assesses how race and socioeconomic factors influence rates of reconstructive procedures and hospital-based outcomes in melanoma patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2010-2015. Patients with melanoma who underwent a reconstructive procedure were identified. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between dependent variables and various patient/hospital components for patients undergoing reconstructive procedures. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic patients had a greater length of stay (LOS) than non-Hispanic White patients (OR: 2.252, p = 0.0307, and OR: 2.592, p = 0.0014), and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive more complex reconstructive procedures (OR: 0.449, p = 0.0487). Patients living in rural areas were less likely to receive complex reconstructive procedures than those in both urban teaching and non-teaching hospitals (OR: 3.313, p = 0.0135, and OR: 3.505, p = 0.0074). Pedicled or rotational flaps were less likely to be performed at medium- or large-sized hospitals (OR: 0.610, p = 0.0296, and OR: 0.496, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Race and socioeconomic factors are important predictors of access to complex reconstructive procedures and hospital-based outcomes following extirpation in melanoma patients.